0003029: HRDSync.rtf documentation mentions HB9DRV, is outdated

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0003029	3 - Current Dev List	Bug	public	2019-01-03 14:22	2019-10-20 17:11

Reporter	K7ZCZ	Assigned To
Priority	normal	Severity	minor	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	new	Resolution	open
Product Version
Target Version		Fixed in Version

Summary	0003029: HRDSync.rtf documentation mentions HB9DRV, is outdated
Description	The product installs to the "C:\Program Files (x86)\HRD Software LLC\Ham Radio Deluxe" directory a file named "HRDSync.rtf" This file contains mentions of HB9DRV and his website, and has outdated content. It's not clear that the "sync" feature remains viable; perhaps it should be removed from the product, along with the documentation. If the feature remains, it should be cleaned up -- including updating this file for content and correctness.
Tags	No tags attached.

Module	Setup
Sub-Module	(select)
Testing	Not Started

KB3NPH 2019-01-03 23:18 administrator ~0006876	The Synchronizer is a viable utility in HRD. It allows users who have transceivers which have very good transmit qualities but questionable receive quality and has CAT control capabilities to synchronize the TX frequency of their transceiver with a communications receiver, which also is capable of CAT control and has much better receiving quality. Many hams have used the Synchronizer in some very ingenious ways to synchronize two different radios together, so, I would definitely say this is a viable utility. The current issue is that it worked in V5.x, but somewhere along the line the code got changed or corrupted in some way so it doesn't function as it was originally designed.

K7ZCZ 2019-06-16 11:15 administrator ~0008096	This issue isn't about rebuilding the Synchronizer feature; it's about the content of this file, specifically. It's easy to place new content into the file, but I'm not the person who should be writing or editing that content because I'm completely unfamiliar with the feature. It's possible that, if the feature changes or is removed, this file should be removed. Looks like Mantis 520 is being used to track the issues with the utility itself.

K7ZCZ 2019-10-20 16:16 administrator ~0008884	this was status == assigned, but was assigned to nobody. I'm resetting the status to "new"

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2019-01-03 14:22	K7ZCZ	New Issue
2019-01-03 23:18	KB3NPH	Note Added: 0006876
2019-01-03 23:19	KB3NPH	Assigned To	=> K7ZCZ
2019-01-03 23:19	KB3NPH	Status	new => assigned
2019-06-16 11:15	K7ZCZ	Note Added: 0008096
2019-06-16 11:15	K7ZCZ	Assigned To	K7ZCZ =>
2019-10-20 16:15	K7ZCZ	Relationship added	related to 0000520
2019-10-20 16:16	K7ZCZ	Assigned To	=> K7ZCZ
2019-10-20 16:16	K7ZCZ	Status	assigned => new
2019-10-20 16:16	K7ZCZ	Note Added: 0008884
2019-10-20 17:11	K7ZCZ	Assigned To	K7ZCZ =>